Neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists for postoperative nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis / Antagonistas do receptor da neurocinina-1 no tratamento de náusea e vômito no pós-operatório: Revisão sistemática e meta-análise

Abstract Background: Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) is a common complication of general anesthesia. Several kinds of antiemetics, including 5-Hydroxytryptamine3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists, and Neurokinin-1 (NK-1) receptor antagonists have been used to treat PONV. Objectives: To compare the antiemetic effect of NK-1 receptor antagonists, including fosaprepitant. Data sources: Online databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, The Cochrane Library databases) were used. Study eligibility criteria, participants, and interventions: Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) performed in patients over 18 years with ASA-PS of I‒III, aimed to assess the efficacy of antiemetics including NK-1 receptor antagonists and 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, and compared the incidence of PONV were included. Study appraisal and synthesis methods: All statistical assessments were conducted by a random effect approach, and odds ratios and 95% Confidence Intervals were calculated. Results: Aprepitant 40 mg and 80 mg significantly reduced the incidence of vomiting 0‒24 hours postoperatively (Odds Ratio [OR = 0.40]; 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI 0.30‒0.54]; p < 0.001, and OR = 0.32; 95% CI 0.19‒0.56; p < 0.001). Fosaprepitant could also reduce the incidence of vomiting significantly both 0‒24 and 0‒48 hours postoperatively (OR = 0.07; 95% CI 0.02‒0.24; p < 0.001 and OR = 0.07; 95% CI 0.02‒0.23; p < 0.001). Limitations: Risk factors for PONV are not considered, RCTs using multiple antiemetics are included, RCTs for fosaprepitant is small, and some bias may be present. Conclusions and implications of key findings: Aprepitant and fosaprepitant can be effective prophylactic antiemetics for postoperative vomiting. However, more studies are required for higher-quality meta-analyses. Systematic review registration number: CRD42019120188.

Resumo Histórico: Náusea e Vômito no Pós-Operatório (NVPO) é um evento adverso frequente da anestesia geral. Várias classes de antieméticos, incluindo antagonistas do receptor 5-Hidroxitriptamina3 (5-HT3) e antagonistas do receptor da Neurocinina-1 (NK-1), têm sido utilizados para tratar a NVPO. Objetivo: Comparar o efeito antiemético dos antagonistas do receptor NK-1, incluindo o fosaprepitanto. Fontes de dados: Foram utilizadas bases de dados on-line (PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, The Cochrane Library). Critérios de elegibilidade do estudo, participantes e intervenções: Foram incluídos Estudos Clínicos Randomizados (ECR) realizados em pacientes acima de 18 anos classificação ASA I a III, com o objetivo de avaliar a eficácia de antieméticos que incluíssem antagonistas do receptor NK-1 e antagonistas do receptor 5-HT3, e que comparassem a incidência de NVPO. Métodos de avaliação e síntese do estudo: Todas as avaliações estatísticas foram realizadas por abordagem de efeito aleatório e foram calculadas razões de chances e Intervalos de Confiança de 95%. Resultados: As doses de 40 mg e 80 mg de aprepitanto reduziram significantemente a incidência de vômito no período de 0 a 24 horas pós-operatórias (razão de chances [OR = 0,40]; Intervalo de Confiança de 95% [95% IC] 0,30-0,54; p < 0,001 e OR = 0,32; 95% IC 0,19-0,56; p < 0,001). O fosaprepitanto pode também reduzir significantemente a incidência de vômito tanto de 0-24 horas como no período de 0-48 horas pós-operatórias (OR = 0,07; 95% IC 0,02-0,24; p < 0,001 e OR = 0,07; 95% IC 0,02-0,23; p < 0,001). Limitações: Os fatores de risco para NVPO não foram analisados, ECRs usando múltiplos antieméticos foram incluídos, ECRs para fosaprepitanto tinham amostras pequenas, podendo haver algum viés. Conclusões e implicações dos principais achados: Aprepitanto e fosaprepitanto podem ser drogas antieméticas profiláticas efetivas para vômito no pós-operatório. No entanto, são necessários mais estudos para elaboração de meta-análises de melhor qualidade. Número de registro da revisão sistemática: CRD42019120188.

Salvinorin A preserves cerebral pial artery autoregulation after forebrain ischemia via the PI3K/AKT/cGMP pathway

This study aimed to investigate the protective effect of salvinorin A on the cerebral pial artery after forebrain ischemia and explore related mechanisms. Thirty Sprague-Dawley rats received forebrain ischemia for 10 min. The dilation responses of the cerebral pial artery to hypercapnia and hypotension were assessed in rats before and 1 h after ischemia. The ischemia reperfusion (IR) control group received DMSO (1 µL/kg) immediately after ischemia. Two different doses of salvinorin A (10 and 20 µg/kg) were administered following the onset of reperfusion. The 5th, 6th, and 7th groups received salvinorin A (20 µg/kg) and LY294002 (10 µM), L-NAME (10 μM), or norbinaltorphimine (norBIN, 1 μM) after ischemia. The levels of cGMP in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were also measured. The phosphorylation of AKT (p-AKT) was measured in the cerebral cortex by western blot at 24 h post-ischemia. Cell necrosis and apoptosis were examined by hematoxylin-eosin staining (HE) and TUNEL staining, respectively. The motor function of the rats was evaluated at 1, 2, and 5 days post-ischemia. The dilation responses of the cerebral pial artery were significantly impaired after ischemia and were preserved by salvinorin A treatment. In addition, salvinorin A significantly increased the levels of cGMP and p-AKT, suppressed cell necrosis and apoptosis of the cerebral cortex and improved the motor function of the rats. These effects were abolished by LY294002, L-NAME, and norBIN. Salvinorin A preserved cerebral pial artery autoregulation in response to hypercapnia and hypotension via the PI3K/AKT/cGMP pathway.

Palonosetron versus granisetron in combination with aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with gynecologic cancer / 부인종양

OBJECTIVE: There is no research regarding the appropriate antiemetic agents for female patients, especially those receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). We evaluated the antiemetic efficacy of a combination of 5-HT3 receptor with/without aprepitant in patients with gynecological cancer treated with the TC (paclitaxel and carboplatin) regimen of MEC. METHODS: We enrolled 38 patients diagnosed with gynecologic cancer and scheduled to receive the TC regimen. The patients were randomly assigned to receive a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, either palonosetron in the first cycle followed by granisetron in the second cycle or vice versa. In the third cycle, all patients received a combination of the 5-HT3 receptor and dexamethasone with/without aprepitant. RESULTS: When three drugs were administered, palonosetron consistently produced an equivalent complete response (CR) rate to granisetron in the acute phase (89.5% vs. 86.8%, p=0.87) and delayed phase (60.5% vs. 65.8%, p=0.79). With regard to the change in dietary intake, palonosetron exhibited similar efficacy to granisetron in the acute phase (92.1% vs. 89.4%, p=0.19) and delayed phase (65.7% vs. 68.4%, p=0.14). However, in the delayed phase, the addition of aprepitant therapy with a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone produced a higher CR rate than a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist with dexamethasone (93.3% vs. 47.8%, p<0.001) and allowed the patients to maintain a higher level of dietary intake (93.3% vs. 56.5%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The addition of aprepitant therapy was more effective than the control therapy of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, and dexamethasone in gynecological cancer patients treated with the TC regimen.

A Phase 3, randomized, double-blind study of single-dose fosaprepitant for prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting: Results of an Indian population subanalysis.

Context: Currently, there is limited data on the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in Indian patients. Aims: This post hoc study assessed the efficacy and safety of fosaprepitant compared with aprepitant for prevention of CINV in the Indian population. A subgroup analysis was performed from data collected in a phase 3 study of intravenous (IV) fosaprepitant or oral aprepitant, plus the 5-HT 3 antagonist ondansetron and the corticosteroid dexamethasone, in cisplatin-naοve patients with solid malignancies. Materials and Methods: Patients scheduled to receive cisplatin (≥70 mg/m 2 ) were administered a single IV dose of fosaprepitant dimeglumine (150 mg) on day 1 or a 3-day dosing regimen of oral aprepitant (day 1:125 mg, days 2 and 3:80 mg) with standard doses of ondansetron and dexamethasone. Patients recorded nausea and/or vomiting episodes and their use of rescue medication and were monitored for adverse events (AEs) and tolerability. Statistical Analysis Used: Differences in response rates between fosaprepitant and aprepitant were calculated using the Miettinen and Nurminen method. Results: In the Indian subpopulation (n = 372), efficacy was similar for patients in both the fosaprepitant or aprepitant groups; complete response in the overall, acute, and delayed phases and no vomiting in all phases were approximately 4 percentage points higher in the fosaprepitant group compared with the aprepitant group. Fosaprepitant was generally well-tolerated; common AEs were similar to oral aprepitant. Conclusions: IV fosaprepitant is as safe and effective as oral aprepitant in the Indian subpopulation and offers an alternative to the oral formulation.

New orally active anticoagulants in critical care and anesthesia practice: The good, the bad and the ugly.

With the adoption of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban into clinical practice, a new era has arrived in the practice of oral anticoagulants. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) has traditionally been underdiagnosed and under treated in Asia. With increasing longevity, the diagnosis and the need for management of atrial fibrillation (AF) and VTE is likely to increase significantly. The new orally active anticoagulants (NOACs) have reasonably filled the lacunae that clinicians traditionally faced when treating patients with vitamin K antagonist (VKA). Unlike VKA, NOACs do not need frequent monitoring. Therefore, more patients are likely to get therapeutic effects of anticoagulation and thus reduce morbidity and mortality associated with VTE and AF. However, the clinicians need to be circumspect and exercise caution in use of these medications. In particular (in geriatric population), the clinicians should look out for drug-drug interactions and underlying renal insufficiency. This would ensure therapeutic efficacy and minimize bleeding complications. Here, it is important to note that the antidote for NOACs is not available and is a major concern if emergency surgical procedure is required in their presence.

Nuevos anticoagulantes orales en la prevención del ataque cerebrovascular / New oral anticoagulants in stroke prevention

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia. AF increases stroke risk by 5-fold and accounts for 15 percent of stroke. For more than 50 years, vitamin K antagonists were the only available oral anticoagulation. The two major classes of novel oral agents are direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran) and factor Xa inhibitors (apixaban or rivaroxaban). These new agents require no routine laboratory monitoring and they are administered in a fixed dose. Method: A non systematic literature review was performed. Results: We performed a critical review of articles about new oral anticoagulants in stroke prevention. We evaluated properties of these agents and we compare efficacy and safety outcomes shown in clinical trials about new oral anticoagulants in AF. Discussion: New oral anticoagulants are at least as good as warfarin at preventing stroke in patients with AF. They seem to be safer than warfarin with significantly less intracranial bleeding. Trials demonstrate dabigatran to be the most effective in decreasing ischemic strokes, apixaban superior to warfarin with statistically lower mortality, and rivaroxaban no worse than warfarin for those with higher stroke risk. Conclussion: New oral anticoagulants have several advantages in comparison with warfarin, but we need further trials to know better the efficacy and safety of these new agents.

Introducción: La fibrilación auricular (FA) es la arritmia más frecuente, se asocia a un riesgo 5 veces mayor de ataque cerebrovascular (ACV), y da cuenta del 15 por ciento de los ACV isquémicos. Por más de medio siglo el tratamiento anticoagulante oral en FA ha estado limitado al uso de antagonistas de la vitamina K. Los nuevos anticoagulantes orales, se clasifican en dos categorías principales: inhibidores de la trombina como el dabigatrán y los inhibidores del factor Xa, como el apixabán y el rivaroxabán. Estos fármacos no requieren monitorización de los niveles de anticoagulación y se administran en dosis fija. Método: Revisión no sistemática de la literatura. Resultados: Se analizan de manera crítica los artículos sobre nuevos anticoagulantes orales en la prevención de ACV. Se evalúan las propiedades de estos nuevos agentes y se comparan los desenlaces de eficacia y de seguridad de los ensayos clínicos de los estos fármacos. Discusión: Los nuevos anticoagulantes orales son al menos tan efectivos que la warfarina en la prevención de ACV cardioembólico en pacientes con FA. Parecen ser más seguros con menor frecuencia de hemorragia intracranial. El dabigatrán es el más efectivo en disminuir el ACV isquémico, el apixabán es superior a la warfarina con una mortalidad significativamente inferior, y el rivaroxabán es no inferior a warfarina para pacientes con alto riesgo de ACV. Conclusión: Los nuevos anticoagulantes orales ofrecen varias ventajas en comparación a warfarina, sin embargo, se requiere se estudios adicionales para conocer más detalladamente su efectividad y perfil de seguridad.

Rivaroxaban: A novel anticoagulant.

For more than 50 years, warfarin has single-handedly ruled the world of anti-coagulation without any competition, whatsoever! The anticoagulant was made available in 1940 and since then no other anti-coagulant has ever been able to match it in the clinical arena. But it looks like that the advances in the field of anti-coagulation, for the first time, have seriously started to erode its base. This review takes a look at rivaroxaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor and one of the most foremost competitors of warfarin.

Randomised, double-blind, comparative study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ganaton (itopride hydrochloride) and mosapride citrate in the management of functional dyspepsia.

Prokinetic agents like itopride hydrochloride and mosapride citrate are commonly used in the management of functional dyspepsia. However, in a recently conducted international, multicentric study, efficacy of 3 different regimens of mosapride was shown to be comparable to placebo. The objective of this phase 4 randomised, double blind, prospective study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ganaton (itopride hydrochloride) and mosapride citrate in the management of functional dyspepsia among patients attending the gastroenterology outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital. Ganaton 50 mg or mosapride citrate 5 mg three times daily before meals for a period of 2 weeks was administered orally. Thirty functional dyspepsia patients in each group (total = 60) were randomised to receive itopride hydrochloride or mosapride citrate treatment for 2 weeks. In itopride versus mosapride groups, global efficacy as judged by patients was excellent in 17 versus 9 (p < 0.05) and poor in 0 versus 3 (p < 0.05). In itopride versus mosapride group global efficacy as judged by physician was excellent in 24 (80%) versus 15 (50%) and poor in 0 (0%) versus 3 (10%) patients respectively. The global efficacy was rated as excellent to good in significantly (p < 0.05) more number of patients in itopride (93.3%) group as compared to mosapride (63.33 %) group. None of the patients reported any adverse events with itopride treatment. In the mosapride group 5 patients (16.7%) reported adverse events. Two patients (6.7%) were withdrawn from mosapride treatment due to adverse events. The physician rated global tolerability ofitopride versus mosapride treatment as excellent in 23 (76.7%) versus 8 (26.7%) (p < 0.05) and poor in 0 (0%) versus 6 (20%) patients respectively. It may be concluded that ganaton (itopride hydrochloride) is superior in efficacy and safety over mosapride citrate in the management of functional dyspepsia.

Role of pinaverium bromide in south Indian patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

The effect of pinaverium bromide in controlling gastrointestinal symptoms in 61 patients with irritable bowel syndrome was studied, as an open trial. Individually, there was significant relief in abdominal discomfort/pain as well as in bowel symptoms in most of the patients. Abdominal pain was reduced in 49%, stool consistency improved in 74%, straining and urgency decreased in 71% and mucus decreased in 64%. Tolerance to the drug administered was good and side-effects reported were few.

Irritable bowel syndrome treatment using pinaverium bromide as a calcium channel blocker: a randomized double-blind placebo; controlled trial

ANTECEDENTES: El síndrome de intestino irritable es una de las principales causas de días perdidos en el trabajo. Como no se conoce hasta ahora ningún tratamiento realmente efectivo, los pacientes acuden con muchos médicos probando todo tipo de medicinas, durante largos períodos de tiempo que duran años. Así, el síndrome de intestino irritable se ha convertido en un serio problema socio-económico que afecta a la familia y al trabajo. METODOS: Se efectuó un estudio aleatorio, doble ciego, controlado con placebo en 40 pacientes consecutivos con síndrome de intestino irritable (edad media: 31.4 +/- 1.8, rango 17-52 años; mujeres). Se administró oralmente bromuro de pinaverio (50 mg) o placebo, tres veces al día con las comidas. RESULTADOS: El bromuro de pinaverio disminuyó la duración del dolor de varias horas a pocos minutos (p<0.05) y mejoró los síntomas recto-anales. No hubieron efectos secundarios. CONCLUSIONES: El bromuro de pinaverio es inocuo y produce beneficio significativo en la calidad de vida del paciente, por lo que puede ser un medicamento valioso en el tratamiento de pacientes con síndrome de intestino irritable.